Performance Review for Mr. Bush?
Performance Review
So, tonight our fearless Leader will be delivering his State of the Union Address, and we can expect the same platitudes, lies and hackneyed inflections as we’ve always gotten from Mr. Bush. Personally, I’m not going to bother listening, I’ll just read through the recap tomorrow. I know that’s not very sporting of me but I just can’t listen to that man’s voice any more. It’s not like I have much of a choice anyway: The moment his droning tones begin my brain starts to liquify and my eyes glaze over…and I find myself truly thinking about nothing. This happens because his “Big Speech Thing” voice, which sounds like a bored 4th-grader reading a book he doesn’t understand, acts like a bucket of water thrown on the fuse box and none of my circuits work until it dries off. Let’s be fair and remember that there are so few inspiring or even interesting State of the Union speeches (unless you’re a Washington Post analyst) that we can actually list them on a cocktail napkin in 14pt font. But you add in Mr. Bush’s two-digit IQ and naked policy pandering to the ultra-wealthy, to religious fanatics and to the military-industrial complex, and it’s just unendurable.
I think we need a change in the format of the S.O.T.U. address. I think there need to be some stipulations, some requirements, which the President must adhere to.
First off, let’s remember a point so easily forgotten:
The President of the United States of America is meant to represent the wishes, needs and goals of the People of the United States of America. Period. He’s not there to do what he thinks is best all the time, but what the people tell him they want him to do. To do what THEY think is best.
So, I think the President, in his State of the Union, should answer to the major complaints made against him by the people. He should directly answer how he has either fixed or ignored the issues that have plagued his presidency and that the people have repeatedly drawn attention to. If he hasn’t fixed them, he should have to provide direct evidence, not vague statements that blur the focus, why he hasn’t been able to or even tried to fix the problem. More to the point, why has the President consistently failed to effectively bring about the issues at which even HE promised to succeed?
Example? Mr. Bush, at his second inaguaration, promised significant progress in these areas (among others):
* Better Education for Children
* Strong Defense
* Security for Retirement Savings
* Better & Less Expensive Health Care for ALL Americans
Umm, can anyone legitimately contend that he’s effectively addressed even ONE of those issues?
• School funding, on both a state and federal level has gone down nearly every year this man’s been in office. Sure, there has been some window dressing in highly-trumpeted spending bills, but as far as effective funding, just ask any principal or Regional Superintendant across the United States where the money's gone and you'll get the same blank stare that Mr Bush gives when asked what the hell he was doing during the Vietnam War.
• Strong defence? Please. All this means is the sluice is yanked out to let hundreds of bilions of state (tax) dollars into defense contractors' coffers and the like (Halliburton, Boeing and Northrop Grumman, anyone?). This country is FAR, FAR less safe than it was before he took office. It is that way simply because the Bush administration and his corporate cronies don’t care. It’s about the money and the power, pure and simple. We have made more enemies, killed more of our own people than perished on 9/11 and spent our country into an economic ice age since Mr. Bush took office.
• Security for Retirement Savings? Wages have gone down and the median home price has gone UP, which is one significant detractor from American familes being able to even establish a retirement savings, much less have one to protect. More companies send CEOs off with 300 million dollar severance packages while simultaneously firing huge percentages of their workforces and cutting back on 401k and other employee benefit financial programs. Social Security has been pushed closer to the precipice with Mr. Bush’s efforts to privatize the accounts themselves than it ever has been, and any alert member of American citizenry knows that it won’t be long now…
• Health care is in worse shape with every year that passes in this country. More families now live without a drop from the health care faucet than in 2000 (look it up). An overnight stay in most hospitals in America is more expensive than it was in 2000 and an astounding number of major employers in this country have either made their health care programs more expensive or in some cases cut them out entirely. And most of those lucky enough to still be able to afford the premiums have found the actual quality of the health care itself has plummeted. The medical industry is out of control, and all this administration has done is to willfully encourage this kind of patient-fleecing behavior to continue.
So, how many of my readers (all 3 of them) have ever had to sit through the yearly or bi-early Performance Review at their job? Sometimes it’s more than just worrying about getting a raise or not, there's genuine concern about keeping your job! Employers will be thoroughly prepared to hit you with tough questions about your failures and it will be up to you to deflect them (with facts if possible, not grandiose statements of intent and motivations read from those cheeseball posters on the breakroom walls) and sell your own genuine successes at the job.
Now why doesn’t our President have to do that? Why does he get to fail miserably at his job and, far worse than that, actually betray the people whom he is meant to represent! He has poisoned our homeland, murdered our people and hundreds of thousands abroad…earned us vicious and powerful enemies in fantatical religious groups as well as seriously threatening states. Mr. Bush has ignored his people repeatedly and flagrantly ignored or attacked the Constitution and the tattered remnants of the Bill of Rights.
Why does he still have a job?
.


5 Comments:
My sympathies, Jeremy. This is yet one more thing that makes me grateful to be living my side of the water; it's bad enough having Bush's lickspittle Blair as our glorious leader, but at least he doesn't get to grandstand on TV once a year about how great a job he is doing,and how everything will turn out OK if we just trust him. Damn them both to hell. It can be very hard to maintain faith in one's fellow men sometimes, when you see who they end up electing - twice! (Or, in Blair's case, THREE times!!).
The Department of Defense, headquartered in the Pentagon, is one of the most massive organizations on the planet, with net annual operating costs of $635 billion, assets worth $1.3 trillion, liabilities of $1.9 trillion and more thatn 2.9 million military and civilian personnel as of fiscal year 2005.
I am a 2 tour Vietnam Veteran who recently retired after 36 years of working in the Defense Industrial Complex on many of the weapons systems being used by our forces as we speak.
It is difficult to convey the complexity of the way DOD works to someone who has not experienced it. This is a massive machine with so many departments and so much beaurocracy that no president, including Bush totally understands it.
Presidents, Congressmen, Cabinet Members and Appointees project a knowledgeable demeanor but they are spouting what they are told by career people who never go away and who train their replacements carefully. These are military and civil servants with enormous collective power, armed with the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Defense Industrial Security Manuals, compartmentalized classification structures and "Rice Bowls" which are never mixed.
Our society has slowly given this power structure its momentum which is constant and extraordinarily tough to bend. The cost to the average American is exhorbitant in terms of real dollars and bad decisions. Every major power structure member in the Pentagon's many Washington Offices and Field locations in the US and Overseas has a counterpart in Defense Industry Corporate America. That collective body has undergone major consolidation in the last 10 years. What used to be a broad base of competitive firms is now a few huge monoliths, such as Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and Boeing.
Government oversight committees are carefully stroked. Sam Nunn and others who were around for years in military and policy oversight roles have been cajoled, given into on occasion but kept in the dark about the real status of things until it is too late to do anything but what the establishment wants. This still continues - with increasing high technology and potential for abuse.
Please examine the following link to testimony given by Franklin C. Spinney before Congress in 2002. It provides very specific information from a whistle blower who is still blowing his whistle (Look him up in your browser and you get lots of feedback) Frank spent the same amount of time as I did in the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) but in government quarters. His job in government was a similar role to mine in defense companies. Frank's emphasis in this testimony is on the money the machine costs us. It is compelling and it is noteworthy that he was still a staff analyst at the Pentagon when he gave this speech. I still can't figure out how he got his superior's permission to say such blunt things. He was extremely highly respected and is now retired.
http://www.d-n-i.net/fcs/spinney_testimony_060402.htm
The brick wall I often refer to is the Pentagon's own arrogance. It will implode by it's own volition, go broke, or so drastically let down the American people that it will fall in shambles. Rest assured the day of the implosion is coming. The machine is out of control.
If you are interested in a view of the inside of the Pentagon procurement process from Vietnam to Iraq please check the posting on this blog entitled, "Odyssey of Armaments"
http://rosecoveredglasses.blogspot.com/2006/11/odyssey-of-armaments.html
The following links may also be of interest:
http://pogo.org/
http://www.d-n-i.net/top_level/about_us.htm
hey jeremy. good entry. you should write for the onion. you have a poignant yet witty way of saying things; things that i usually won't bother to read in the paper, although i know i should if not to add to my frustration, to simply educate myself. but reading yours is so much more fun and at the same time informative. i had a dream today that i was fleeing the country. i was trying to find a ticket to london but it was too expensive...funny how i dreamed that and then read your blog regarding our decaying government.
Jeremy - this is your fourth, concerned reader responding; I daresay, there will be more and more responses from your succinct analyses, plus, after Mr. Birdbrain (ooo, an insult to all of our fine-feathered friends!) Bush's fractured 'State' ramblings this evening.
I agree with Ellen's suggestion that this blog, as well as others, should be more widely circulated through various responsible publications. Proud of you, man.
Keep on Blogging!!!
Jeremy,
You are going to wake up in Guantanamo Bay one day.
Victor
Post a Comment
<< Home